The french private TV M6 has won 3 of
the most influent hits of this summer: firstly with the final of
european football cup, secondly with the Quantico TV cop show with
ccomplexity, and finally with the french adaptation from the english
Benefits Street joking about
the poor people.
That's
the TV canal which made Bog Brother,
Undercover Boss and
The Apprentice in
France, so what could we expect?
I
admit I didn't see the entiere show as I was bored and I can't help
myself to see all of this.
I also
admit that I was excpetating worst than what I saw.
Because
this is the kind of show that creates debates BEFORE to be released!
There
are caricatural comments and shoots, but hey, they followed a few
people, and then we always speak about the late trains and never
about the punctual ones. So we'll remember this ''people from the
north region'' drinking beer all day instead of looking for a job,
and we won't remember the mom taking care of her son's friends. But
she is in the same documentary.
Caricatural
as when I heard ''if you want a job you can have one'', but in a
region where the financial power closed the main firms (so I don't
think there is a lot of jobs in the area).
Here
is a nice explaination on what are our memories made of, well, how
our brain builds memories, false memories (sorry, it's in french, but
one day there will be the same in englsih):
So my
opinion is that there is a big problem with the original ''format''.
We could have shooted more ''nice'' people and less abusive (or
despressive) people ''just waiting for the social helps to buy
alcohol''. We could have know more about the social and economical
environment for each individual, we coule have a global view so it
would have been less stigmatizing.
Hey,
is that me or are they giving the postal adress (and if you didn't
understood there is a nice architect's 3D to show you where these
people live in the district)? Isn't it contrary to journalistic
ethics?
So
what is the objective of the channel, showing THIS documentary,
shooted like THAT and builded THIS way? The worst is when you read
the director talking about wanting to show the consequences of theunemployment, and you'ld want to ask why the broadcast does not match
with his living experience? That's weird.
I'm
pretty sure I wouldn't question like that if we were not one year
before our presidential election...
.
No comments:
Post a Comment